Axiell Quria Ideas
Welcome to the Ideas Portal for Quria users!
Axiell invites customers to contribute ideas for new features or functions. While we can't develop every suggestion, your input helps shape Quria’s roadmap. You are welcome to add ideas, vote on others’ suggestions, and discuss them. To make this portal more effective, please submit your ideas in English.
Ideas are regularly reviewed by the product manager or local representative. Once reviewed, the ideas are visible for voting and discussion. Popular ideas will be prioritized within our backlog.
Status meanings:
Under investigation: Developers and specialists are discussing if the idea is possible to implement.
Planned: The suggestion will be fulfilled in some way in a foreseeable future
Future consideration: A good idea, without technical obstacles, but it can't be prioritized into the roadmap at the moment.
No action: Technical or other issues prevent development, or an alternative solution exists.
We reserve the right to reject ideas and to close issues after 3 months if we don't receive answers to follow-up questions.
For technical issues, please contact your local support.
Welcome to the Ideas Portal for Quria users!
Axiell invites customers to contribute ideas for new features or functions. While we can't develop every suggestion, your input helps shape Quria’s roadmap. You are welcome to add ideas, vote on others’ suggestions, and discuss them. To make this portal more effective, please submit your ideas in English.
Ideas are regularly reviewed by the product manager or local representative. Once reviewed, the ideas are visible for voting and discussion. Popular ideas will be prioritized within our backlog.
Status meanings:
Under investigation: Developers and specialists are discussing if the idea is possible to implement.
Planned: The suggestion will be fulfilled in some way in a foreseeable future
Future consideration: A good idea, without technical obstacles, but it can't be prioritized into the roadmap at the moment.
No action: Technical or other issues prevent development, or an alternative solution exists.
We reserve the right to reject ideas and to close issues after 3 months if we don't receive answers to follow-up questions.
For technical issues, please contact your local support.
Ja, riktig. Flott at dere tar med ideen videre, og takk for søketips Magdalena og Linda :) Mvh Ida
Aha, jag förstår. Om det sökbegrepp sökbegrepp du skriver in matchar en titel, så ska den titeln hamna överst i listan. Så om jag skriver andre verdenskrig så vill jag ha verk med titlar som är exakt Andre verdenskrig överst, även om träfflistan består av massor med böcker som har Andre verdenskrig som ämnesord, antar jag. Detta är tyvärr lite knepigt då vi har den här nya datamodellen, ett verk har olika titlar (verktitlar, uttryckstitlar, manifestationstitlar). Men jag sparar ert förslag till framtiden!
Jag vill också tipsa om prefixet tim: som söker i "huvudtiteln", dvs i det som i MARC motsvarar 245 a.
Hälsningar, Magdalena
Vi opplever også dette. For å få eksakt treff må vi skrive tit:Tittel.
Hei,
jeg legger ved et par eksempler:
"Håpløst" av Våhlund og "Er mor død" av Hjort.
Det blir litt bedre dersom man bruker citationstecken, men de havner likevel ikke på toppen av listen.
Mvh Ida
Hej,
Tack så mycket för denna synpunkt.
Det ska inte vara så att man får träff på titlar som bara innehåller ett av orden i sökfrågan. Kan du skicka några exempel på när du tycker att det inträffar?
Eftersom Quria har "fuzzy-sök" så behöver man tala om ifall det är en exakt titel man söker efter och det gör man genom att sätta titel inom citationstecken. Om du provar det, får du fortfarande ingen bra träfflista?
Hälsningar
Magdalena Olofsson