Axiell Quria Ideas

Welcome to the Ideas Portal for Quria users!
Axiell invites customers to contribute ideas for new features or functions. While we can't develop every suggestion, your input helps shape Quria’s roadmap. You are welcome to add ideas, vote on others’ suggestions, and discuss them. To make this portal more effective, please submit your ideas in English.

Ideas are regularly reviewed by the product manager or local representative. Once reviewed, the ideas are visible for voting and discussion. Popular ideas will be prioritized within our backlog.

Status meanings:

  • Under investigation: Developers and specialists are discussing if the idea is possible to implement.

  • Planned: The suggestion will be fulfilled in some way in a foreseeable future

  • Future consideration: A good idea, without technical obstacles, but it can't be prioritized into the roadmap at the moment.

  • No action: Technical or other issues prevent development, or an alternative solution exists.

We reserve the right to reject ideas and to close issues after 3 months if we don't receive answers to follow-up questions.

For technical issues, please contact your local support.

Darstellung Suchergebnis und Recherche | Display of search results and research

Die Darstellung des Suchergebnisses sollte unbedingt die zusätzlichen Felder "Erscheinungsjahr" und "Notation" umfassen, da nur so eine spezifischeres Suchergebnis möglich ist.

Die Darstellung des Suchergebnisses sollte an dieser Stelle so aussehen:

  • Feld „Geistiger Schöpfer“ könnte man besser „Verfasser“ nennen

  • Feld „Titel“ eintragen

  • Feld „Klassifikationen“ Notation eintragen / siehe oben unter Punkt 1.) D.)

  • Feld „Erscheinungsjahr“ aktuellstes Jahr eintragen

  • Feld „Arten“ sollte besser „Medienarten“ heißen

  • Feld „Sprache“ kann wegfallen


English:

The display of the search result should definitely include the additional fields "Year of publication" and "Notation", as this is the only way to obtain a more specific search result.


The display of the search result should look like this at this point:


- The "spiritual creator" field could be better called "author".


- Enter the "Title" field


- Enter the notation in the "Classifications" field / see above under point 1.) D.)


- Enter the most recent year in the "Year of publication" field


- Types field should be called Media Types


- The "Language" field can be omitted

Screenshot aufg...
Antwort an Frau...
Attachments Open full size
  • Marcel Peters
  • Feb 14 2023
  • Future consideration
Collections / Germany
  • Attach files
  • Marcel Peters commented
    17 Mar, 2023 09:43am

    Hi,


    i added a new attachment to this idea.

    In this Word Document is the answer from ms Frank.


    Best regards

    Marcel Peters

    Attachments Open full size
  • Admin
    Magdalena Olofsson (Axiell) commented
    15 Mar, 2023 01:25pm

    Hi,

    Thank you for your feedback.

    We have discussed about showing the earliest publication year before, but we are not sure that this would make it better or even more confusing.

    When it comes to classification, the information is stored on work and there can be many classifications on one work. We are not sure of how useful it is in all countries.

    According to RDA the term "Creator" should be used instead of "author", since the person or organisation that is ackredited to the work can be of other types than "author", e g "composer" or "painter".

    I believe that language is very needed since the list is presenting the results per language expression.

    We are investigating if it would be possible to create an possibility to switch between this search result and one that presents the list of manifestations.

    Best regards

    Magdalena Olofsson

    Attachments Open full size

Related ideas