Axiell wants to get our customers to be involved in the roadmaps suggesting ideas for features or functions. Unfortunately we cannot develope each and every function suggested but we want to make sure that you have your say. Add your ideas, and opinions to Axiell's roadmap for Quria, creating new features that yours and other libraries would benefit from. You can also vote for other peoples suggestions as well.
In order to make this portal more useful for all the contributors and for us that work with your ideas, we kindly ask you to write in English.
Please note: If you have an error or a misbehaving function, please contact your local Support for the best possible service. If you are not sure what forum that is the most appropriate for your issue, please choose local support as a first step.
How it works:
The ideas are read and reviewed on a regular basis, by product manager and/or local representative. Your ideas will then be available for others to see, vote on and discuss. We encourage discussions between the idea contributors.
Successful ideas will the be prioritzed within our backlog.
What does the status mean?
Under investigation - often there needs to be a discussion between developers and system specialists before we can say if something can be developed, how and when.
Planned - this suggestion or need will be fufilled in some way in a forseable future.
Future consideration - this status means that we think that it's good idea with no technical obstacles but it's not decided if it can be prioritized and put on the roadmap.
No action - in some cases it is impossible to meet some requirements for technical or other reasons, and sometimes there is another alternative way to solve the need.
Right to reject and close
We reserve the right to reject ideas, and also close issues after 3 months if we don't receive an answer to our follow up questions.
Bezugnehmend auf Frau Nuvolins Idee vom 1.12.2021 fände ich es noch sinnvoll, wenn die "Anzahl der Ausleihen" in den Medienliste wie Abteilung, Bereich, Medientyp, etc auch sortierbar wäre. So könnte man die Bestleiher schneller filtern.
(Bitte entschuldigen Sie, wenn diese Idee schon existiert, aber leider fehlt mir die Zeit, alle Ideen durchzuschauen.)
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Kathleen Paetznick / Ernst-Abbe-Bücherei Jena
Referring to Ms. Nuvolin's idea of December 1st, 2021, I think it would still make sense if the "number of loans" in the media list such as department, area, media type, etc. could also be sorted. So you could filter the best lenders. (Please excuse if this idea already exists, but unfortunately I don't have the time to look through all the ideas.)
Hello Magdalena,
In this case, it's not about the top lists in the statistics, but about something like Henning Mankell's most frequently borrowed titles. Or the most borrowed titles of a media type. Both as examples. Or can you also filter them in the top lists? If yes, is there any training material? I'll send an example of what I mean.
Best regards
Hi,
I understand this requirement but I am curious of the use case. There is a top list functionality in Analytics that gives you the titles that have been "best lenders" in a specific time period. Why is it needed to get an item list sorted on the amount of loans? I'm qurious about how the bulk items function is used :)
Regards
Magdalena