Axiell Quria Ideas


Welcome to the Ideas Portal for Quria users!

Axiell wants to get our customers to be involved in the roadmaps suggesting ideas for features or functions. Unfortunately we cannot develope each and every function suggested but we want to make sure that you have your say. Add your ideas, and opinions to Axiell's roadmap for Quria, creating new features that yours and other libraries would benefit from. You can also vote for other peoples suggestions as well.


In order to make this portal more useful for all the contributors and for us that work with your ideas, we kindly ask you to write in English.


Please note: If you have an error or a misbehaving function, please contact your local Support for the best possible service. If you are not sure what forum that is the most appropriate for your issue, please choose local support as a first step.


How it works:
The ideas are read and reviewed on a regular basis, by product manager and/or local representative. Your ideas will then be available for others to see, vote on and discuss. We encourage discussions between the idea contributors.

Successful ideas will the be prioritzed within our backlog.


What does the status mean?


Under investigation - often there needs to be a discussion between developers and system specialists before we can say if something can be developed, how and when.

Planned - this suggestion or need will be fufilled in some way in a forseable future.


Future consideration - this status means that we think that it's good idea with no technical obstacles but it's not decided if it can be prioritized and put on the roadmap.

No action - in some cases it is impossible to meet some requirements for technical or other reasons, and sometimes there is another alternative way to solve the need.


Right to reject and close
We reserve the right to reject ideas, and also close issues after 3 months if we don't receive an answer to our follow up questions.

Bekräfta e-post och telefonnummer i formulär

Vi har ett ökande antal personuppgiftsincidenter som gäller reservationsmeddelanden, kvitton och liknande som skickats till fel person. Detta beror på att låntagare skrivit fel när de själva lagt in sin e-postadress/telefonnummer. Vi skulle vilja att det fanns bekräftelsefält för både e-post och mobilnummer i lånekortsformuläret så att man åtminstone måste skriva in uppgiften två gånger.

  • Sara Britta Jadelius
  • Dec 21 2022
  • Planned
  • Attach files
  • Linda Oderbrant commented
    01 Oct 09:07

    Allra helst skulle vi vilja att låntagare måste bekräfta sitt låntagarkonto via mailen. Så som är brukligt på många andra internetföretag och dyl. Då kan man inte ange fel adress ens två gånger. En del låntagare får ju för sig att de har en adress och så stämmer det inte riktigt. Bäst vore det om man alltså måste bekräfta via sin egen e-post.

  • Admin
    Magdalena Olofsson (Axiell) commented
    December 21, 2022 12:25

    Hej! Tack, det var ett bra förslag. Vi ska utveckla ett gränssnitt för att ni ska kunna påverka innehållet i formuläret nästa år och jag tar med detta på önskelistan.

    God jul!

    Magdalena