Welcome to the Ideas Portal for Quria users!
Axiell invites customers to contribute ideas for new features or functions. While we can't develop every suggestion, your input helps shape Quria’s roadmap. You are welcome to add ideas, vote on others’ suggestions, and discuss them. To make this portal more effective, please submit your ideas in English.
Ideas are regularly reviewed by the product manager or local representative. Once reviewed, the ideas are visible for voting and discussion. Popular ideas will be prioritized within our backlog.
Status meanings:
Under investigation: Developers and specialists are discussing if the idea is possible to implement.
Planned: The suggestion will be fulfilled in some way in a foreseeable future
Future consideration: A good idea, without technical obstacles, but it can't be prioritized into the roadmap at the moment.
No action: Technical or other issues prevent development, or an alternative solution exists.
We reserve the right to reject ideas and to close issues after 3 months if we don't receive answers to follow-up questions.
For technical issues, please contact your local support.
in der Konfiguration für die Selbstverbucher sollte es die Möglichkeit geben, die erzwungene Rückbuchung von reservierten oder entliehenen Medien auszuschließen, um zu verhindern, dass diese von anderen Lesern am Automaten verbucht werden können.
Hi, I am quite sure that a reserved item that is trapped to a reader/user/patron and notification sent can not be lended by someone else in the self service machines.That is at least how it is supposed to work, I can of course not verify it in your environment. Can you please test it in your library and contact the German support team if it's not working as I described?
Best regards
Magdalena
reader means user
Hi,
I understand that you mean that if someone loans a book that is on loan to another patron, you don't want the book to be automatically returned and lended out. But what do you mean with "reservierten medien"?
Regards
Magdalena