Axiell wants to get our customers to be involved in the roadmaps suggesting ideas for features or functions. Unfortunately we cannot develope each and every function suggested but we want to make sure that you have your say. Add your ideas, and opinions to Axiell's roadmap for Quria, creating new features that yours and other libraries would benefit from. You can also vote for other peoples suggestions as well.
In order to make this portal more useful for all the contributors and for us that work with your ideas, we kindly ask you to write in English.
Please note: If you have an error or a misbehaving function, please contact your local Support for the best possible service. If you are not sure what forum that is the most appropriate for your issue, please choose local support as a first step.
How it works:
The ideas are read and reviewed on a regular basis, by product manager and/or local representative. Your ideas will then be available for others to see, vote on and discuss. We encourage discussions between the idea contributors.
Successful ideas will the be prioritzed within our backlog.
What does the status mean?
Under investigation - often there needs to be a discussion between developers and system specialists before we can say if something can be developed, how and when.
Planned - this suggestion or need will be fufilled in some way in a forseable future.
Future consideration - this status means that we think that it's good idea with no technical obstacles but it's not decided if it can be prioritized and put on the roadmap.
No action - in some cases it is impossible to meet some requirements for technical or other reasons, and sometimes there is another alternative way to solve the need.
Right to reject and close
We reserve the right to reject ideas, and also close issues after 3 months if we don't receive an answer to our follow up questions.
We are a collaborative project with 8 Swedish municipalities where public libraries, school libraries and high school libraries are in the same database and share the same catalogue. Reservation collaborations in similar constellations often mean that public libraries borrow from each other but not from school libraries. Despite this, all these units are lined up in the same organizational structure in Quria and when searching, the large number of school libraries can make it difficult for librarians to see which books are in which public libraries (and vice versa).
My suggestion is that it should be possible to set the LIBRARY TYPE in the system settings. On this page you can fill in any values, such as "Public Library", "School Library", "Court Library", "Whatever".
Under Organization Settings, you should be able to specify which unit is one of the specified, above mentioned, Library types.
This is then intended to be used primarily as a filter when performing searches (or perhaps even in a statistical context?) in Quria. You can set your hit list on the basic organizational structure that Quria has today, as well as "filter by Library type". In this way, users will become more observant of which books are in or can be reserved at their library type that share the same reservation cooperation. Noise in hit lists must strive to be decreased to a minimum, and this becomes even more apparent as more and more municipalities see benefits of merging into a joint databases (like ours).