Axiell wants to get our customers to be involved in the roadmaps suggesting ideas for features or functions. Unfortunately we cannot develope each and every function suggested but we want to make sure that you have your say. Add your ideas, and opinions to Axiell's roadmap for Quria, creating new features that yours and other libraries would benefit from. You can also vote for other peoples suggestions as well.
In order to make this portal more useful for all the contributors and for us that work with your ideas, we kindly ask you to write in English.
Please note: If you have an error or a misbehaving function, please contact your local Support for the best possible service. If you are not sure what forum that is the most appropriate for your issue, please choose local support as a first step.
How it works:
The ideas are read and reviewed on a regular basis, by product manager and/or local representative. Your ideas will then be available for others to see, vote on and discuss. We encourage discussions between the idea contributors.
Successful ideas will the be prioritzed within our backlog.
What does the status mean?
Under investigation - often there needs to be a discussion between developers and system specialists before we can say if something can be developed, how and when.
Planned - this suggestion or need will be fufilled in some way in a forseable future.
Future consideration - this status means that we think that it's good idea with no technical obstacles but it's not decided if it can be prioritized and put on the roadmap.
No action - in some cases it is impossible to meet some requirements for technical or other reasons, and sometimes there is another alternative way to solve the need.
Right to reject and close
We reserve the right to reject ideas, and also close issues after 3 months if we don't receive an answer to our follow up questions.
In the reservations section, we can search for active reservations but this category includes reservations on shelf list as well as active reservations for media that are currently borrowed by someone else. It would therefore be great if one could differ between the two categories of active reservations or if the difference were at least visible in the results list. Thank you!
Hi,
In order to keep the Ideasportal up to date I am closing ideas older than 3 years with no votes.
Please let me know if you think that this specific one should remain open.
Best regards
Magdalena
Thanks for the clarification!
I wish you a nice weekend
Magdalena
The problem is that they are not always shown on the shelf list, from time to time we have reservations with a wrong active date that do not appear on the shelf list. This is why we would like to have such a function, we would then be able to check if we have not missed any reservation. But you are right: If the active date issue would be solved and everything worked as it should, we would not need such a function:-). Thank you!
Happy new year!
Aha, ok. Those reservations are shown in the shelf list, what is the purpose of having them marked up in the bulkhandling of reservations? I'm just trying to understand the use case :)
Magdalena
Hi Magdalena, thanks for your reply and Happy New Year:-)! Unfortunately this is not what I mean: we would like to search for reservations on the shelf list, not on the reservation shelf (=reservation for an item that is available at the library placed by patron, but not yet trapped by a librarian). This is not possible at the moment, these reservations have the same status (Reservierung platziert) as all the reservations for items that are currently not available, and there is no possibility to distinguish them from each other in the results list. It would already be enough if we could distinguish them from each other in the list. Thank you for looking into this!
Hi!
I am not sure what you mean, but there is a possibility to only get the reservations that are trapped on reservation shelf by using the filter for "Eingegangen, im reservierungsregal. These are not included in the search for "Reservierung platziert".
Is this an answer to you request or have I misunderstood?
Regards
Magdalena