Axiell Quria Ideas


Welcome to the Ideas Portal for Quria users!

Axiell wants to get our customers to be involved in the roadmaps suggesting ideas for features or functions. Unfortunately we cannot develope each and every function suggested but we want to make sure that you have your say. Add your ideas, and opinions to Axiell's roadmap for Quria, creating new features that yours and other libraries would benefit from. You can also vote for other peoples suggestions as well.


In order to make this portal more useful for all the contributors and for us that work with your ideas, we kindly ask you to write in English.


Please note: If you have an error or a misbehaving function, please contact your local Support for the best possible service. If you are not sure what forum that is the most appropriate for your issue, please choose local support as a first step.


How it works:
The ideas are read and reviewed on a regular basis, by product manager and/or local representative. Your ideas will then be available for others to see, vote on and discuss. We encourage discussions between the idea contributors.

Successful ideas will the be prioritzed within our backlog.


What does the status mean?


Under investigation - often there needs to be a discussion between developers and system specialists before we can say if something can be developed, how and when.

Planned - this suggestion or need will be fufilled in some way in a forseable future.


Future consideration - this status means that we think that it's good idea with no technical obstacles but it's not decided if it can be prioritized and put on the roadmap.

No action - in some cases it is impossible to meet some requirements for technical or other reasons, and sometimes there is another alternative way to solve the need.


Right to reject and close
We reserve the right to reject ideas, and also close issues after 3 months if we don't receive an answer to our follow up questions.

In Collections / Items, allow an additional filter for the period of use

There are many medias with a high total number of items on loan, but which have been badly lent out in recent years and which we would therefore like to filter and discard. So far we only have the possibility to find out the media that were "inactive" from day X onwards. With the "Number of Loans" filter, the system uses the total number of loans. However, if we want to remove media that were only borrowed 1 - 3 times in the past year or in the past two years, we have no way of determining them.

This makes stock management difficult and many media that are loaned but have poor overall loans cannot be removed.

That is why we would also like to have the option of specifying the usage time (year) as a component when researching loans.


***

ORIGINAL text:

Es gibt viele Medien mit einer hohen Gesamtausleihzahl, welche aber in den letzten Jahren schlecht ausgeliehen werden und die wir deshalb gerne filtern und ausscheiden würden. Bisher haben wir nur die Möglichkeit die Medien herauszufinden die ab Tag X "inaktiv" waren. Beim Filter "Anzahl der Ausleihen" greift das System auf die Gesamtausleihzahl zurück. Wenn wir aber Medien die z.B. im vergangenen Jahr oder in den vergangenen zwei Jahren nur 1 - 3 mal ausgeliehen waren aus dem Bestand nehmen möchten haben wir keine Möglichkeit diese zu ermitteln.

Das macht die Bestandspflege schwierig und viele Medien die zwar eine Ausleihe aber insgesamt einen schlechten Umsatz haben können nicht ermittelt werden.

Deshalb wünschen wir uns zusätzlich die Möglichkeit bei der Recherche nach Ausleihen zusätzlich die Nutzungszeit (Jahr) als Komponente mit anzugeben.



  • Anita Nuvolin
  • Dec 1 2021
  • Future consideration
  • Attach files
  • Fabian Scherkenbach commented
    7 Jun 01:16pm

    Yes please! We dearly miss a feature like this. Our approach to collection maintenance is based on the number of loans in the two or three recent years – not the total amount of loans or the inactivity in the last year alone.